September 3, 2025 • Nelson Cicchitto

SailPoint’s Multi-Vendor Requirements Drive Up Total Costs: Why Avatier Offers a More Cost-Effective Solution

Discover how SailPoint’s multi-vendor approach drives up costs while Avatier’s platform delivers comprehensive IAM and better ROI.

Governance Reduces Compliance Costs in Banking

Identity and access management (IAM) has become a cornerstone of enterprise security strategies. However, not all IAM solutions deliver the same value proposition when it comes to total cost of ownership (TCO). Many organizations implementing SailPoint’s identity solutions are discovering a hidden cost challenge: the multi-vendor approach that significantly increases implementation complexity, maintenance requirements, and overall expenses.

The Hidden Cost of SailPoint’s Multi-Vendor Architecture

SailPoint’s identity governance and administration (IGA) solution has established itself as a prominent player in the market. However, its architecture often necessitates integration with multiple additional vendors to create a comprehensive identity management ecosystem. According to a 2023 Gartner report, organizations implementing complex IAM solutions like SailPoint’s spend an average of 40% more on integration costs than initially budgeted.

This multi-vendor approach creates several cost-driving challenges:

1. Integration Complexity and Professional Services Requirements

SailPoint implementations typically require extensive professional services to integrate with other identity components. A typical enterprise deployment can require 3-5 additional vendors to achieve comprehensive IAM coverage:

  • A separate privileged access management (PAM) solution
  • Additional MFA implementation
  • Separate user provisioning systems
  • Standalone password management tools
  • Distinct access request workflows

This fragmentation leads to extended implementation timelines, with SailPoint projects often taking 12-18 months to fully deploy. According to a recent Forrester study, the average large enterprise spends $750,000 to $1.2 million on implementation services alone for complex IAM deployments.

2. Ongoing Maintenance and Operational Overhead

Once implemented, the multi-vendor approach creates persistent operational challenges:

  • Multiple administrative interfaces requiring specialized expertise
  • Separate support contracts and renewal cycles
  • Complex troubleshooting across vendor boundaries
  • Increased vulnerability management efforts
  • Higher training costs for IT staff

A 2023 Enterprise Strategy Group (ESG) survey found that organizations with fragmented IAM infrastructures spend 42% more on operational costs compared to those with unified solutions.

3. License Cost Multiplication

The need for multiple vendors means multiple license agreements, each with their own pricing models, minimums, and renewal terms. This often leads to:

  • Overlapping functionality you pay for twice
  • Inability to optimize licenses across solutions
  • Complex renewal negotiations with multiple vendors
  • Difficult cost justification to leadership

The Avatier Advantage: A Unified Approach to Identity Management

In contrast to SailPoint’s fragmented approach, Avatier’s Identity Anywhere Lifecycle Management offers a comprehensive, unified identity platform that dramatically reduces TCO while enhancing security and user experience.

1. Comprehensive Capabilities in a Single Platform

Avatier’s unified platform includes:

  • Identity lifecycle management
  • Access governance and certification
  • Password management and self-service
  • Multi-factor authentication integration
  • User provisioning and de-provisioning
  • Group management
  • Role-based access control
  • Workflow automation

By delivering these capabilities in a single, cohesive platform, Avatier eliminates the need for multiple vendors, complex integrations, and disparate administrative interfaces.

2. Rapid Implementation and Time-to-Value

Unlike SailPoint’s lengthy implementation cycles, Avatier’s unified architecture enables rapid deployment. Organizations typically achieve full implementation in 3-6 months—a fraction of the time required for multi-vendor approaches.

This acceleration delivers several benefits:

  • Faster security improvements
  • Quicker compliance achievements
  • Reduced implementation costs
  • Earlier ROI realization

3. Reduced Operational Overhead

Avatier’s unified platform significantly reduces ongoing operational costs:

  • Single administrative interface
  • Unified support and maintenance
  • Consistent user experience
  • Streamlined upgrades and patches
  • Simplified license management

Avatier’s Identity Management Architecture is designed from the ground up to minimize operational complexity while maximizing security and functionality.

Real-World Cost Comparison: SailPoint vs. Avatier

To illustrate the cost differences, let’s examine a typical enterprise implementation scenario for a 5,000-employee organization over a three-year period:

SailPoint Multi-Vendor Approach:

Initial Implementation Costs:

  • SailPoint IdentityIQ licenses: $450,000
  • Additional vendor licenses (PAM, MFA, etc.): $375,000
  • Professional services for implementation: $850,000
  • Integration development: $225,000 Total Initial Costs: $1,900,000

Annual Recurring Costs:

  • SailPoint maintenance and support: $90,000
  • Additional vendor maintenance: $75,000
  • Operational staff (3 FTEs): $360,000
  • Ongoing integration maintenance: $50,000 Annual Recurring: $575,000 Three-Year TCO: $3,625,000

Avatier Unified Approach:

Initial Implementation Costs:

Annual Recurring Costs:

  • Avatier maintenance and support: $125,000
  • Operational staff (1.5 FTEs): $180,000
  • Ongoing integration maintenance: $20,000 Annual Recurring: $325,000 Three-Year TCO: $1,975,000

The difference is striking: $1,650,000 in savings over three years with Avatier—a 46% reduction in total cost of ownership.

Beyond Cost: Additional Benefits of Avatier’s Unified Approach

While cost savings are compelling, Avatier’s unified platform delivers several additional advantages over SailPoint’s multi-vendor approach:

1. Enhanced Security Posture

Fragmented identity solutions create security gaps at integration points. Avatier’s unified platform eliminates these vulnerabilities by providing consistent security controls across all identity functions. According to a 2023 Ponemon Institute study, organizations with unified IAM platforms experience 37% fewer identity-related security incidents than those with fragmented approaches.

2. Improved Compliance Capabilities

Regulatory frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX require comprehensive identity governance. Avatier’s platform provides built-in compliance features and reporting that span the entire identity lifecycle, unlike multi-vendor approaches that often struggle with cross-vendor compliance reporting.

Organizations in highly regulated industries like healthcare, financial services, and government can particularly benefit from Avatier’s compliance-focused solutions.

3. Superior User Experience

SailPoint’s multi-vendor approach typically creates disjointed user experiences as employees navigate different interfaces for various identity tasks. Avatier delivers a consistent, intuitive experience across all identity functions, improving productivity and reducing help desk calls.

4. Future-Proof Architecture

As identity requirements evolve, Avatier’s unified platform allows for seamless capability expansion without the integration challenges of multi-vendor environments. This architectural advantage enables organizations to adapt more quickly to emerging security threats and compliance requirements.

What CISOs and IT Leaders Should Consider

When evaluating identity management solutions, consider these critical questions:

  1. What is the true TCO of your IAM solution? Look beyond initial licensing to understand implementation, integration, and operational costs.
  2. How many vendors will you need to manage? Each additional vendor increases complexity, cost, and risk.
  3. What is your expected time-to-value? Lengthy implementations delay security improvements and ROI realization.
  4. How will your solution adapt to evolving requirements? Identity needs constantly change—ensure your solution can evolve without massive reinvestment.
  5. What level of expertise will be required? Multi-vendor solutions often require specialized skills for each component, increasing staffing costs and creating key-person dependencies.

Conclusion: The Business Case for Unified Identity Management

While SailPoint has established itself as a market presence, its multi-vendor approach creates significant cost, complexity, and operational challenges for organizations. Avatier’s unified identity platform delivers comprehensive capabilities with substantially lower TCO, faster implementation, and reduced operational overhead.

For CISOs and IT leaders facing budget constraints while needing to strengthen security postures, Avatier’s unified approach represents not just a cost-saving opportunity but a strategic advantage in managing identity risk.

By consolidating identity management functions into a single, cohesive platform, organizations can achieve stronger security, better compliance, improved user experiences, and dramatically lower total cost of ownership.

In today’s security landscape, where identity has become the primary perimeter, choosing the right identity management approach isn’t just an IT decision—it’s a business imperative that affects organizational risk, operational efficiency, and bottom-line performance.

When considering your identity management strategy, look beyond feature checklists to understand the architectural differences that drive long-term costs and outcomes. The unified approach offered by Avatier delivers compelling advantages that make it the smart choice for forward-thinking organizations.

Try Avatier today

Nelson Cicchitto