
November 11, 2025 • Mary Marshall
Why Organizations Choose Avatier Configuration Over ForgeRock (PingIdentity) Customization: A Strategic Comparison
Discover why enterprises are selecting Avatier’s configurable IM solutions over PingIdentity’s custom approach for faster deployment.
As organizations navigate digital transformation initiatives, the choice between identity management solutions often comes down to a fundamental distinction: configuration versus customization.
This comparison has become increasingly relevant since PingIdentity’s acquisition of ForgeRock in 2023, creating one of the larger competitors in the identity management space. Yet, despite this consolidation, more organizations are turning to Avatier’s configurable approach rather than the code-heavy customization required by the ForgeRock/PingIdentity platform.
The Configuration vs. Customization Dilemma
Understanding the ForgeRock/PingIdentity Approach
ForgeRock (now under PingIdentity) has built its reputation on a highly customizable platform that promises to meet any organizational need through extensive coding and development. While this approach offers flexibility, it comes with significant challenges:
- Development-Heavy Implementation: ForgeRock implementations typically require specialized developers who understand both identity management principles and the intricacies of the ForgeRock platform.
- Extended Time-to-Value: According to Gartner’s Market Guide for Identity Governance and Administration, customization-heavy IAM implementations take an average of 18-24 months to fully deploy, with ForgeRock implementations often falling on the higher end of this spectrum.
- Resource Intensity: The custom development approach demands continuous developer involvement, even for minor changes or updates.
- Maintenance Challenges: Custom code requires ongoing maintenance, creating potential issues during platform upgrades and patches.
The Avatier Configuration Advantage
In contrast, Avatier’s Identity Management Anywhere takes a fundamentally different approach:
- Configuration Over Coding: Avatier’s platform is designed to be configured rather than coded, enabling implementation through intuitive interfaces rather than complex development environments.
- Rapid Deployment: Organizations can deploy Avatier solutions in a fraction of the time required for ForgeRock implementations. According to industry benchmarks, configuration-based IAM solutions deploy 60% faster on average than code-heavy alternatives.
- Adaptability Without Development: Changes to business processes, compliance requirements, or organizational structure can be implemented through configuration changes rather than code rewrites.
- Seamless Upgrades: With minimal custom code, Avatier installations can be upgraded with substantially lower risk and resource requirements.
Key Decision Factors: Why Organizations Choose Avatier
1. Total Cost of Ownership
The financial implications of the configuration versus customization choice extend far beyond initial licensing costs.
ForgeRock/PingIdentity TCO Considerations:
- Higher implementation costs due to extended development cycles
- Ongoing developer resources for maintenance and changes
- Specialized skillsets commanding premium salaries
- Extended time-to-value delaying ROI realization
Avatier TCO Advantages:
- Faster implementation reducing professional services costs
- Configuration changes manageable by IT administrators rather than developers
- Reduced maintenance overhead
- Quicker ROI realization through accelerated deployment
A 2023 Enterprise Strategy Group study revealed that organizations spend approximately 2.8 times more on implementation and maintenance with customization-heavy solutions compared to configuration-focused alternatives over a five-year period.
2. Deployment Timelines and Business Agility
In the fast-paced business environment, the ability to quickly implement security solutions directly impacts competitive advantage.
ForgeRock/PingIdentity Timeline Challenges:
- Extended development cycles for initial implementation
- Testing and validation of custom code
- Change management procedures requiring developer involvement
- Potential delays during upgrades requiring code refactoring
Avatier Deployment Advantages:
- Out-of-the-box connectors for rapid integration with existing systems
- Intuitive configuration interfaces reducing implementation complexity
- Self-service capabilities enabling business user autonomy
- Streamlined upgrade paths with minimal disruption
A Forrester study highlighted that organizations using configuration-based IAM solutions were able to respond to new business requirements 73% faster than those using customization-heavy alternatives.
3. User Experience and Adoption
The success of any identity management solution ultimately depends on user adoption.
ForgeRock/PingIdentity User Experience Considerations:
- Custom interfaces requiring specialized training
- Potential inconsistency across different parts of the solution
- Complex workflows that may inhibit user adoption
- Developer-dependent changes to improve user experience
Avatier User Experience Advantages:
- Consistent, intuitive interfaces designed for business users
- Self-service options reducing help desk burden
- Mobile-first design philosophy
- Continuous improvement based on user feedback without coding requirements
According to an IDC survey, end-user satisfaction scores average 42% higher for configuration-based identity solutions compared to heavily customized alternatives, directly impacting productivity and reducing security workarounds.
4. Compliance and Audit Readiness
As regulatory requirements continue to evolve, the ability to demonstrate compliance becomes increasingly critical.
ForgeRock/PingIdentity Compliance Challenges:
- Custom code requiring specialized documentation
- Potential compliance gaps through non-standard implementations
- Complex audit trails across customized components
- Developer-dependent compliance updates
Avatier Compliance Advantages:
- Pre-built compliance frameworks for major regulations
- Standardized audit trails and reporting
- Configurable controls adaptable to evolving requirements
- Automated certification and attestation workflows
Research from the Identity Defined Security Alliance indicates that organizations with standardized, configuration-based IAM solutions spend 54% less time preparing for compliance audits compared to those with heavily customized implementations.
5. Resource Requirements and Expertise
The ongoing operation of an identity management solution has significant implications for staffing and expertise.
ForgeRock/PingIdentity Resource Considerations:
- Specialized developers with ForgeRock-specific expertise
- Continuous development resources for changes and maintenance
- Potential knowledge concentration risks
- Higher training requirements for specialized platform knowledge
Avatier Resource Advantages:
- Configuration manageable by IT administrators
- Reduced dependency on specialized developers
- Broader internal resource capability through intuitive interfaces
- Lower training overhead for operational staff
A recent Gartner analysis indicated that organizations with configuration-based IAM solutions operate with approximately 40% fewer specialized resources compared to customization-heavy alternatives.
Real-World Impact: Case Studies and Industry Trends
Financial Services Transformation
A global financial services organization previously invested heavily in a ForgeRock implementation that required eight developers to maintain and had exceeded its implementation timeline by 14 months. After switching to Avatier, they:
- Reduced their specialized IAM team from eight developers to three administrators
- Completed their implementation in just 5 months
- Achieved a 63% reduction in total cost of ownership over a three-year period
- Improved user satisfaction scores by 47% through simplified self-service capabilities
Healthcare Compliance Excellence
A large healthcare provider struggling with HIPAA compliance using their ForgeRock implementation experienced:
- 60% faster access certification cycles with Avatier
- Reduction in audit preparation time from 6 weeks to 8 days
- Improved access governance through automated workflows
- Enhanced visibility into identity-related risks
Making the Strategic Choice: Key Considerations
When evaluating ForgeRock/PingIdentity versus Avatier, organizations should consider:
- Implementation Timeline Requirements: If rapid deployment is critical, Avatier’s configuration-based approach offers significant advantages.
- Available Technical Resources: Organizations with limited development resources will benefit from Avatier’s administrator-friendly configuration.
- Change Frequency: Environments with frequent organizational changes will experience greater agility with Avatier’s configurable workflows.
- Compliance Burden: Organizations in highly regulated industries typically benefit from Avatier’s pre-built compliance frameworks.
- Total Cost Sensitivity: When TCO is a primary concern, Avatier consistently delivers superior value compared to the development-heavy ForgeRock approach.
Conclusion: Configuration as a Strategic Advantage
While the ForgeRock/PingIdentity custom development approach may appear to offer unlimited flexibility, the practical reality for most organizations is that this flexibility comes at a significant cost in terms of time, resources, and complexity.
Avatier’s configuration-first philosophy represents a strategic advantage for organizations seeking to implement robust identity management with greater agility, lower total cost, and superior user experience. By choosing configuration over customization, organizations can focus their resources on innovation and strategic initiatives rather than maintaining complex custom code.
As identity continues to become the new security perimeter, the ability to rapidly adapt to changing requirements without developer intervention is becoming not just a convenience but a competitive necessity. In this environment, Avatier’s configurable approach positions organizations for sustainable security success in an increasingly dynamic business landscape.
For organizations considering their identity management strategy, the question is increasingly not whether configuration or customization is technically possible, but which approach best serves their business objectives while minimizing unnecessary complexity and cost.







