From Procurement to Production: How Avatier Delivers Identity Management Value Faster Than SailPoint

The speed at which organizations can implement identity management solutions directly impacts their security posture and bottom line. When comparing industry leaders Avatier and SailPoint, one crucial differentiator stands out: implementation timeline. This comprehensive analysis explores how these two platforms differ from procurement to production, revealing why Avatier’s innovative approach delivers faster time-to-value for enterprises seeking robust identity governance.

The Critical Timeline Gap in Identity Management Implementation

The implementation timeline for identity and access management (IAM) solutions has become increasingly important as security threats evolve at unprecedented rates. According to a 2023 IBM security report, organizations with fully implemented IAM solutions experienced 50% fewer security breaches, but the average IAM implementation takes 6-12 months—leaving critical security gaps during deployment.

When comparing Avatier and SailPoint implementation timelines, the differences become immediately apparent:

Implementation Phase	Avatier	SailPoint
Initial Deployment	1-4 weeks	3-6 months
First Production Use Case	4-8 weeks	6-9 months
Full Enterprise Deployment	3-6 months	9-18 months
Time to ROI	3-6 months	12-24 months

This dramatic difference in implementation speed comes from fundamentally different architectural approaches to identity management.

Container-Based Deployment: Avatier’s Game-Changing Approach

Avatier’s revolutionary Identity-as-a-Container (IDaaC) approach represents a paradigm shift in identity management deployment. As the world’s first containerized identity management solution, Avatier leverages Docker container technology to deliver pre-configured, standardized implementations that dramatically reduce deployment complexity.

This container-based architecture provides several key advantages:

1. Rapid Deployment: Unlike traditional on-premises deployments that require extensive infrastructure configuration, Avatier’s containers are pre-configured with standardized components that can be deployed in hours rather than weeks.
2. Reduced Professional Services Requirements: The containerized approach minimizes custom coding and configuration, significantly reducing professional services costs that often balloon traditional implementations.
3. Consistent Environments: Containers ensure identical environments across development, testing, and production, eliminating the configuration drift that plagues many SailPoint implementations.
4. Cloud-Native Flexibility: Whether deploying in public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid environments, Avatier’s containers provide consistent performance without the extensive cloud-specific configuration required by SailPoint.

In contrast, SailPoint’s traditional architecture often requires extensive customization at every layer of the technology stack, from database configurations to application servers, middleware integrations, and custom workflows.

Implementation Complexity: Where SailPoint Projects Often Stall

SailPoint implementations typically involve multiple interdependent phases that must be completed sequentially:

1. Infrastructure Planning: SailPoint requires dedicated database, application, and web servers with specific configurations.
2. Base Installation: Initial software deployment across multiple servers.
3. Core Configuration: Extensive identity model customization.
4. Connector Setup: Individual configuration for each enterprise application.
5. Role Engineering: Creation of complex role models that often require business process reengineering.
6. Custom Workflow Development: Extensive custom coding for approval workflows.
7. Testing and Validation: Multi-phase testing across all customized components.

Each of these phases introduces potential delays and requires specialized expertise, often resulting in implementation timelines stretching well beyond initial projections.

Avatier’s Workflow-First Approach Accelerates Time-to-Value

Avatier takes a fundamentally different approach with its Identity Anywhere Lifecycle Management platform. Rather than beginning with complex role engineering projects, Avatier focuses on rapidly implementing core workflows that deliver immediate business value:

1. Self-Service Password Management: Typically deployed within days, immediately reducing helpdesk calls by 30-40%.
2. Access Request Workflows: Implemented in weeks rather than months, providing immediate governance improvements.
3. User Provisioning Automation: Phased approach that delivers incremental value throughout the implementation.
4. Certification Campaigns: Risk-based approach that prioritizes high-value systems first.

This workflow-first methodology stands in stark contrast to SailPoint’s comprehensive but time-consuming implementations that often require complete role engineering before delivering any tangible value to the organization.

Professional Services Requirements: The Hidden Cost and Timeline Factor

One often overlooked aspect of identity management implementations is the professional services component. SailPoint implementations typically require significantly more professional services support:

Professional Services Requirement	Avatier	SailPoint
Implementation Consultants	1-2	3-8
Technical Architects	0-1	2-3
Custom Developers	0-1	2-4
Duration of Services	2-4 months	9-18 months

This substantial difference in professional services requirements not only impacts total cost of ownership but also introduces scheduling dependencies that frequently extend project timelines. Many organizations report that limited availability of qualified SailPoint consultants has extended their implementation timelines by 3-6 months beyond initial projections.

Avatier’s streamlined approach typically requires minimal professional services support, with the platform’s intuitive configuration tools enabling internal teams to manage most aspects of the implementation. The Avatier professional services team provides targeted expertise rather than comprehensive implementation support, accelerating deployment while building internal capabilities.

Connector Ecosystem: Rapid Integration vs. Custom Development

Application connectors represent another critical factor in implementation timelines. While both vendors offer extensive connector libraries, their approaches to connector deployment differ significantly:

Avatier provides a library of pre-configured application connectors that can be deployed with minimal configuration, typically in hours rather than days. The platform’s standardized connector framework enables rapid integration with enterprise applications, cloud services, and directory systems.

SailPoint’s connector framework often requires extensive customization for enterprise applications, with each connector typically requiring 2-4 weeks of configuration and testing. For custom applications, SailPoint implementations frequently require development of bespoke connectors, adding months to implementation timelines.

Real-World Implementation Comparison: Financial Services Case Study

A Fortune 500 financial services organization that evaluated both platforms provides a revealing real-world comparison:

SailPoint Implementation Plan (Original)

• Initial deployment: 4 months
• First use case in production: 7 months
• Complete enterprise rollout: 14 months

SailPoint Implementation (Actual)

• Initial deployment: 7 months (+75%)
• First use case in production: 11 months (+57%)
• Complete enterprise rollout: 22 months (+57%)
• Total professional services cost: 320% of initial software investment

Avatier Implementation (Actual)

• Initial deployment: 3 weeks
• First use case in production (password management): 6 weeks
• Complete enterprise rollout: 5 months
• Total professional services cost: 60% of software investment

This 78% reduction in time-to-value provided the organization with both immediate security improvements and accelerated return on investment, with the Avatier solution delivering positive ROI within the first year compared to SailPoint’s projected 3-year ROI timeline.

The Adoption Advantage: User Experience Impacts Implementation Success

Implementation timelines are not solely determined by technical deployment factors. User adoption rates significantly impact overall project success and timeline. Avatier’s consumer-grade user experience and mobile-first approach have demonstrated adoption rates 2-3 times higher than typical SailPoint implementations.

This adoption advantage comes from Avatier’s focus on self-service capabilities that mirror consumer applications rather than complex enterprise software interfaces. Higher adoption rates accelerate implementation timelines by:

1. Reducing training requirements
2. Minimizing change management challenges
3. Decreasing support tickets during rollout
4. Enabling faster organizational acceptance

SailPoint implementations often require extensive user training and change management programs, adding months to effective deployment timelines even after technical implementation is complete.

Compliance Acceleration: Meeting Regulatory Deadlines

For organizations facing regulatory deadlines, implementation timeline becomes particularly critical. Avatier’s modular approach enables rapid deployment of compliance-specific capabilities, particularly for industries with stringent regulatory requirements:

• HIPAA compliance for healthcare
• FERPA compliance for education
• FISMA compliance for government
• NERC CIP compliance for energy

The platform’s pre-configured compliance workflows and reports enable organizations to demonstrate compliance progress within weeks rather than months, often a critical factor for organizations responding to audit findings or regulatory changes.

Conclusion: The Business Impact of Accelerated Identity Management

The difference between Avatier’s rapid deployment model and SailPoint’s extended implementation timeline has significant business implications beyond mere convenience:

1. Security Risk Exposure: Each month of delayed implementation represents continued exposure to identity-related security risks that comprehensive IAM would mitigate.
2. Operational Efficiency: Faster implementation of automation capabilities delivers immediate operational benefits through reduced manual processes.
3. Compliance Posture: Accelerated deployment of governance capabilities improves compliance posture more quickly.
4. Total Cost of Ownership: Reduced professional services requirements and faster time-to-value significantly impact three-year TCO calculations.
5. Resource Allocation: Shorter implementation timelines free IT and security resources for other strategic initiatives.

For organizations evaluating identity management solutions, implementation timeline should be a primary consideration alongside feature comparisons and pricing models. Avatier’s innovative container-based architecture and workflow-first approach consistently deliver enterprise identity management value in a fraction of the time required by traditional solutions like SailPoint, making it the clear choice for organizations prioritizing rapid security improvements and accelerated return on investment.

When security risks evolve daily, waiting a year or more for complete identity governance implementation isn’t just inconvenient—it’s a business risk that modern organizations can no longer afford to take.

Try Avatier today