ForgeRock (PingIdentity) Customization Complexity vs. Avatier’s No-Code Configuration: Why CISOs Are Switching

As organizations increasingly recognize, not all IAM platforms deliver equal value when implementation complexity, ongoing maintenance, and total cost of ownership are considered. This analysis examines the substantial differences between ForgeRock (now part of Ping Identity following their 2023 acquisition) and Avatier’s approaches to platform customization and configuration.

The Hidden Cost of Customization: ForgeRock’s Development-Heavy Model

ForgeRock has built its reputation on flexibility and extensibility. However, this flexibility comes at a significant price that many enterprises discover only after implementation begins. According to a 2022 Gartner report, IAM implementations requiring extensive customization typically exceed budgets by 30-40% and extend timelines by 3-6 months beyond initial projections.

Development Resources Required

ForgeRock implementations typically demand:

1. Specialized Developers: Java expertise and ForgeRock-specific knowledge
2. Lengthy Custom Coding Cycles: Requiring weeks or months for basic implementation
3. Ongoing Developer Support: For maintenance, updates, and security patches

A 2023 industry survey by Enterprise Strategy Group found that 67% of organizations using heavily customized IAM solutions maintain at least 2-3 full-time developers dedicated solely to IAM platform maintenance and customization. This represents a hidden operational cost that can exceed $300,000-$450,000 annually for many organizations.

The TCO Problem

The real challenge with ForgeRock’s development-centric approach becomes evident when calculating total cost of ownership (TCO):

• Initial Implementation Costs: 3-5x higher than configuration-focused alternatives
• Extended Timelines: 6-12 months for full deployment vs. 1-3 months for configuration-based solutions
• Ongoing Maintenance: Custom code requires continuous attention, especially during platform upgrades
• Risk Exposure: Extended implementation periods leave security gaps unaddressed

As one CISO at a Fortune 500 company noted in a recent industry panel: “We originally budgeted $1.2 million for our ForgeRock implementation. Three years later, we had spent over $3 million and still hadn’t fully deployed all planned functionality.”

Avatier’s Configuration-First Approach: No-Code Identity Management

In stark contrast to ForgeRock’s development requirements, Avatier’s Identity Management Anywhere platform embraces a configuration-centric philosophy that dramatically reduces implementation complexity while maintaining enterprise-grade capabilities.

Key Configuration Advantages

1. No-Code Implementation: Business analysts and security teams can configure without developer resources
2. Pre-Built Connectors: Over 140 application connectors ready for immediate deployment
3. Intuitive UI-Based Configuration: Visual workflow builders replace custom coding requirements
4. Rapid Deployment: Implementation measured in weeks rather than months or years

According to data from Avatier’s customer implementation records, organizations migrating from developer-heavy IAM platforms like ForgeRock achieve an average of:

• 72% reduction in implementation timelines
• 68% lower total cost of ownership over three years
• 91% decrease in required implementation personnel

Real-World Implementation Comparison

To better understand the practical differences, consider these typical implementation scenarios:

ForgeRock Implementation Process

1. Discovery and Architecture (4-8 weeks)
2. Custom Development (12-26 weeks)
3. Integration and Testing (8-12 weeks)
4. User Acceptance Testing (4-8 weeks)
5. Deployment (2-4 weeks)
6. Post-Implementation Adjustments (Ongoing)

Total Timeline: 30-58 weeks (7-14 months) Resources Required: Java developers, IAM specialists, project managers, business analysts

Avatier Implementation Process

1. Discovery and Architecture (2-3 weeks)
2. Configuration and Integration (4-6 weeks)
3. Testing (2-3 weeks)
4. Deployment (1-2 weeks)

Total Timeline: 9-14 weeks (2-3.5 months) Resources Required: IAM administrator, business analyst

Technical Capability Comparison

While implementation approach differs dramatically, both platforms offer enterprise-grade identity capabilities. However, the accessibility of these features varies significantly:

User Provisioning Workflows

ForgeRock: Requires custom Java development to create provisioning workflows, including custom approvals, notifications, and integrations.

Avatier: Features drag-and-drop workflow configuration where non-developers can create complex provisioning scenarios with conditional logic, multi-level approvals, and automated actions without writing code.

Access Certification and Compliance

ForgeRock: Offers robust access review capabilities but requires significant customization to align with specific compliance frameworks.

Avatier: Provides out-of-the-box compliance solutions for major regulations including HIPAA, SOX, NIST 800-53, and GDPR through configuration rather than customization.

Integration Capabilities

ForgeRock: Supports extensive integrations but typically requires custom connector development.

Avatier: Delivers over 140 pre-built connectors and a no-code connector framework that allows non-developers to integrate with virtually any application through REST APIs, SCIM, or direct database connections.

The Security Implications of Implementation Complexity

Beyond cost and timeline considerations, implementation complexity directly impacts security posture. According to the 2023 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report, organizations with partial or incomplete IAM deployments face 2.3x higher risk of identity-related security incidents.

The configuration-first approach offers clear security advantages:

1. Reduced Exposure Window: Faster implementation means critical identity controls are in place sooner
2. Simplified Updates: Security patches and enhancements deploy without custom code reconciliation
3. Consistent Security Model: Pre-built components adhere to security best practices without variation
4. Rapid Response to Threats: Configuration changes can be implemented immediately without development cycles

Migration Considerations: Moving From ForgeRock to Avatier

For organizations currently using ForgeRock and experiencing the customization burden, migration to a configuration-based platform like Avatier presents a compelling opportunity. However, transitions between IAM platforms require careful planning.

Key Migration Steps

1. Current State Assessment: Document existing identity workflows, integrations, and customizations
2. Configuration Mapping: Map custom ForgeRock processes to Avatier’s configuration capabilities
3. Phased Migration: Begin with core functionality like password management and access requests
4. Parallel Operation: Run systems simultaneously during transition
5. Incremental Cutover: Move users and functionality in manageable groups

Migration Success Factors

Organizations successfully migrating from developer-heavy platforms typically:

• Focus initial migration on highest-value, lowest-complexity functionality
• Leverage the migration as an opportunity to simplify overly complex workflows
• Engage business stakeholders early to ensure new configurations meet requirements
• Use migration as a catalyst for broader identity governance improvements

Why Leading Organizations Are Making the Switch

The shift from customization-dependent platforms to configuration-centric solutions represents a fundamental evolution in IAM strategy. This transition is being driven by:

1. Cost Pressures: CFOs and CIOs demanding better ROI from security investments
2. Security Acceleration: Compressed timelines for implementing zero-trust architectures
3. Resource Constraints: Cybersecurity talent shortages making developer-dependent solutions unsustainable
4. Cloud Migration: Movement to SaaS and cloud platforms requiring more adaptable identity solutions

As one IT Director at a global manufacturing company explained after their migration: “We spent three years trying to bend ForgeRock to our needs with costly developers. Within three months of switching to Avatier, we had achieved more functionality with half the team and none of the ongoing development headaches.”

The Business Impact Beyond IT

The difference between configuration and customization extends beyond technical considerations to broader business impacts:

Business Agility

ForgeRock’s Customization Model: Changes require development cycles, testing, and deployment windows, often taking weeks or months.

Avatier’s Configuration Approach: Business changes can be implemented in hours or days, allowing security teams to keep pace with organizational evolution.

Governance and Compliance

ForgeRock: Compliance updates often require developer intervention to adjust access reviews, reports, and controls.

Avatier: Compliance changes can be managed through configuration by governance teams, ensuring rapid adaptation to regulatory changes.

User Experience

ForgeRock: Custom interfaces require significant development and testing, leading many organizations to accept suboptimal user experiences.

Avatier: Configuration-driven interfaces promote consistent, intuitive experiences across all identity functions without development overhead.

Conclusion: The Future Belongs to Configuration, Not Customization

As identity and access management continues its evolution from technical infrastructure to business enabler, the contrast between customization-dependent and configuration-centric platforms becomes increasingly significant. Organizations must evaluate IAM solutions not just on feature lists but on the practical reality of implementation, maintenance, and adaptation.

ForgeRock’s acquisition by Ping Identity further complicates the customization landscape, as customers now face potential platform consolidation and migration challenges. Meanwhile, Avatier’s consistent focus on configuration-based implementation continues to deliver faster time-to-value with dramatically lower total cost of ownership.

For CISOs and IT leaders evaluating identity platforms, the question increasingly becomes not “Can this platform be customized to meet our needs?” but rather “Can this platform be configured to meet our needs without customization?” Where agility and efficiency are paramount, configuration is rapidly replacing customization as the preferred approach for sustainable identity management.

Try Avatier today