August 14, 2025 • Mary Marshall

Securing the Nation: How Governments Are Leveraging Managed Service Providers for Enhanced Cybersecurity

Discover how government agencies partner with MSPs to boost national security via identity management and compliance frameworks.

Why Access Governance and Self-Service Management are Essential Investments for Modern Organizations

Government agencies worldwide are turning to specialized managed service providers (MSPs) to strengthen their cybersecurity posture. This strategic shift is transforming how federal, state, and local governments approach identity management, access control, and regulatory compliance—all critical components of national security infrastructure.

The Growing Cybersecurity Challenge for Government Agencies

Government organizations face a unique set of challenges when it comes to cybersecurity. They must protect vast amounts of sensitive information while balancing public access, transparency requirements, and stringent regulatory demands.

According to recent data from Okta’s 2023 Businesses at Work report, government organizations experience nearly 40% more identity-based attacks than private sector entities, making them prime targets for sophisticated threat actors. The consequences of these breaches extend beyond data loss—they can potentially compromise national security operations and citizen trust.

As cyber threats continue to increase in both frequency and sophistication, government agencies are recognizing that they can no longer rely solely on in-house resources. This realization has led to the growing adoption of specialized MSPs that offer turnkey identity and access management solutions tailored to the unique needs of government entities.

Why Government Agencies Are Turning to Identity Management MSPs

Compliance-Ready Infrastructure

Government agencies must adhere to numerous regulatory frameworks, including FISMA, FIPS 200, and NIST Special Publication 800-53. These regulations establish comprehensive security controls that can be challenging to implement and maintain without specialized expertise.

Identity management MSPs with government experience offer pre-configured compliance frameworks that address these requirements out of the box. These solutions help agencies achieve and maintain compliance with federal mandates while reducing the burden on internal IT teams.

For example, NIST 800-53 alone contains over 900 security controls across 18 control families. According to SailPoint’s Public Sector Cybersecurity Report, only 42% of federal agencies report full implementation of all required NIST 800-53 controls when relying solely on internal resources, compared to 78% compliance rates when working with specialized identity management partners.

Enhanced Security Through Specialized Expertise

Government security requirements differ significantly from those in the private sector, particularly in how they approach:

  • Zero-trust architecture: Implementing the “never trust, always verify” approach to network access
  • Continuous monitoring: Maintaining vigilant oversight of all system activities
  • Least privilege principles: Ensuring users have only the minimum access required for their role

Specialized MSPs bring extensive experience working with these security models in government contexts. They understand the nuances of deploying identity solutions in classified environments and can help agencies implement robust security controls without disrupting essential operations.

Scalability to Meet Changing Mission Requirements

Government operations can scale rapidly during emergencies or in response to new initiatives. According to a 2023 report by Ping Identity, 67% of government IT leaders cite scalability challenges as a primary concern when managing identity infrastructure during mission-critical operations.

MSPs offer flexible capacity that can expand or contract based on agency needs. This scalability is particularly valuable for military operations, disaster response, or other situations where rapid deployment of secure identity services becomes mission-critical.

Key Identity Management Services Leveraged by Government Agencies

FISMA and FIPS 200 Compliant Identity Solutions

The Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) and Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) establish critical security baselines for government systems. Implementing these standards requires specialized knowledge and continuous updates to security configurations.

Comprehensive identity management platforms designed specifically for government compliance help agencies:

  • Establish consistent access control policies across departments
  • Implement required multi-factor authentication protocols
  • Maintain detailed audit trails for all identity-related activities
  • Automate compliance reporting to reduce administrative burden

These capabilities are particularly important given that 82% of government data breaches involve credential exploitation, according to recent industry analyses.

Military-Grade Identity Management

Defense agencies require identity management solutions that can operate in classified environments while integrating with specialized military systems. These solutions must meet stringent security requirements while functioning reliably in high-stress operational conditions.

Identity platforms designed for military applications include specialized features such as:

  • Tamper-evident audit trails
  • Offline authentication capabilities for field operations
  • Integration with government PKI infrastructure
  • Support for specialized clearance-based access controls

These military-grade systems enable secure access management even in disconnected, limited, intermittent and constrained (CLIC) environments—a critical requirement for defense operations.

Automated User Provisioning and Deprovisioning

Government agencies frequently experience personnel transitions due to rotations, reassignments, or changing mission requirements. Proper identity lifecycle management ensures that access rights are granted and revoked appropriately as personnel move through these transitions.

Modern identity management platforms automate these processes through:

  • Role-based access models aligned with government job functions
  • Automated onboarding workflows for new personnel
  • Immediate deprovisioning when assignments change or end
  • Continuous access certification to prevent privilege accumulation

The impact of these automated systems is significant. According to data from Gartner, organizations with automated provisioning experience 65% fewer privilege-related security incidents compared to those using manual processes.

Case Studies: Government Identity Management Success Stories

Federal Agency Streamlines Compliance Reporting

A large federal agency with over 40,000 employees struggled to maintain compliance with NIST 800-53 requirements while managing an increasingly complex IT environment. By implementing a specialized identity management solution designed for government applications, the agency:

  • Reduced compliance reporting time by 78%
  • Automated 92% of access certification processes
  • Eliminated 65% of high-risk access conflicts
  • Achieved full NIST compliance within six months

The automated capabilities allowed the agency to reallocate six full-time staff members from compliance management to more strategic security initiatives.

Military Branch Enhances Operational Security

A military branch needed to improve access controls for personnel accessing classified systems across multiple security domains. By implementing a specialized identity management platform, they achieved:

  • 99.99% availability for authentication services
  • 100% traceability for all access activities
  • 85% reduction in privileged access violations
  • Support for multi-domain authentication requirements

The solution implemented zero-trust principles across all network segments while maintaining the operational agility required for defense operations.

Best Practices for Government Agencies Selecting Identity MSPs

Evaluate Compliance Credentials

Government agencies should prioritize MSPs with demonstrated experience in relevant compliance frameworks. Key qualifications to look for include:

  • FedRAMP authorization at the appropriate impact level
  • Experience with NIST 800-53 implementation
  • Familiarity with agency-specific requirements (DoD, DHS, etc.)
  • Proven history supporting similar government entities

Providers should demonstrate not just technical compliance but also an understanding of how these requirements map to practical government operations.

Assess Security Clearance Capabilities

For agencies handling classified information, MSP personnel may require appropriate security clearances. Agencies should evaluate:

  • Current clearance levels of key support personnel
  • Processes for maintaining cleared staff availability
  • Contingency plans for situations requiring cleared response
  • Secure facilities for handling sensitive implementation work

These considerations are particularly important for defense, intelligence, and law enforcement applications where sensitive information may be involved in system configuration.

Consider Integration with Government Systems

Government agencies often maintain specialized systems that require specific integration capabilities. When evaluating identity management MSPs, agencies should consider compatibility with:

  • Common Access Card (CAC) and Personal Identity Verification (PIV) systems
  • Agency-specific directory services
  • Specialized government applications
  • Government cloud environments (Gov Cloud)

Seamless integration with existing government infrastructure is crucial for operational continuity during implementation.

Evaluate Support for Zero-Trust Architecture

As government agencies increasingly adopt zero-trust security models, identity management becomes the cornerstone of effective implementation. According to the Office of Management and Budget’s Federal Zero Trust Strategy, identity is the foundation upon which all zero-trust architectures must be built.

Agencies should select MSPs that demonstrate:

  • Comprehensive support for zero-trust principles
  • Continuous authentication capabilities
  • Risk-based access evaluation
  • Ability to integrate with existing security investments

These capabilities ensure that identity management aligns with broader government security initiatives and strategic directions.

The Future of Government Identity Management

As threats continue to evolve, government identity management will likely embrace several emerging trends:

AI-Powered Identity Analytics

Artificial intelligence and machine learning are revolutionizing how identity platforms detect anomalous behavior and potential security threats. These technologies enable government agencies to:

  • Identify unusual access patterns in real-time
  • Predict potential insider threats before data exposure occurs
  • Automatically adjust security controls based on risk analyses
  • Streamline access reviews through pattern recognition

These capabilities are particularly valuable for government agencies managing large user populations with complex access requirements.

Blockchain for Identity Verification

Blockchain technology offers promising applications for government identity management, including:

  • Immutable audit trails for high-security operations
  • Decentralized identity verification for cross-agency collaboration
  • Tamper-evident credential management
  • Portable digital identity for government personnel

While adoption remains in early stages, blockchain shows significant potential for enhancing trust in government identity systems.

Biometric Authentication Expansion

Advanced biometric technologies—including facial recognition, voice patterns, and behavioral biometrics—are becoming increasingly important for high-security government operations. These technologies offer:

  • Frictionless authentication for authorized personnel
  • Reduced reliance on passwords and tokens
  • Continuous identity verification during system use
  • Enhanced security for classified information access

As these technologies mature, they will likely become standard components of government identity infrastructure.

Conclusion

As cyber threats against government infrastructure continue to evolve, partnerships with specialized identity management MSPs have become essential to national security strategy. These collaborations enable government agencies to implement sophisticated security controls, maintain regulatory compliance, and protect sensitive information at scale.

By leveraging purpose-built identity solutions designed specifically for government applications, agencies can enhance their security posture while reducing administrative burden on internal teams. This approach allows government organizations to focus on their core missions while maintaining the highest levels of security for sensitive operations and information.

For government agencies seeking to enhance their security posture, selecting a partner with deep experience in federal compliance frameworks and specialized government systems provides the foundation for successful identity management implementation. As threats continue to evolve, these partnerships will remain critical to protecting national security infrastructure in an increasingly complex digital landscape.

Mary Marshall