ForgeRock (PingIdentity) Implementation Complexity vs Avatier’s Rapid Go-Live

As organizations navigate digital transformation, they face a critical decision when selecting an identity and access management (IAM) solution: complex, resource-intensive platforms like ForgeRock (now part of Ping Identity following a $2.8 billion acquisition) or more agile, business-ready solutions like Avatier’s Identity Anywhere platform.

The Hidden Costs of ForgeRock Implementation

ForgeRock’s platform has earned a reputation for its comprehensive features and flexibility. However, this flexibility comes at a significant cost: implementation complexity. According to industry data, the average ForgeRock implementation takes 6-12 months to complete—more than double the industry average of 3-6 months for most IAM solutions.

This extended timeline translates directly to higher costs. Organizations implementing ForgeRock typically need to budget for:

• Extended professional services engagements
• Specialized developer resources
• Prolonged periods of running parallel systems
• Delayed realization of security benefits

A 2023 study by Enterprise Strategy Group found that 68% of organizations exceeded their initial budgets for complex IAM implementations, with the average overage reaching 47% of the original projected costs. For enterprises with limited IT resources, this financial uncertainty creates significant business risk.

The Technical Debt of Customization

ForgeRock’s platform requires extensive customization to meet specific business requirements. While this offers flexibility, it creates substantial technical debt that organizations must manage throughout the lifecycle of their IAM investment.

This customization-heavy approach presents several challenges:

1. Resource Dependency: Organizations become dependent on specialized developers and consultants for ongoing maintenance and updates.
2. Upgrade Complexity: Heavily customized deployments can make upgrades difficult and costly.
3. Documentation Burden: Custom implementations require extensive documentation to maintain operational continuity.
4. Knowledge Transfer Risks: Staff turnover can create significant knowledge gaps.

According to a recent Gartner analysis, organizations with highly customized IAM deployments spend an average of 30% more on maintenance over a five-year period compared to those with more standardized implementations.

Avatier’s Rapid Go-Live Approach

In stark contrast to ForgeRock’s complexity, Avatier’s Identity Management Anywhere platform emphasizes rapid deployment and business-ready functionality. By focusing on configurable, no-code/low-code approaches, Avatier delivers comparable identity security capabilities without the implementation burden.

Key Components of Avatier’s Rapid Deployment Model

1. Pre-Built Application Connectors

Avatier maintains one of the industry’s largest libraries of pre-built application connectors, enabling immediate integration with hundreds of common enterprise applications and cloud services. This eliminates the need for custom connector development—often one of the most time-consuming aspects of IAM implementations.

1. No-Code Workflow Designer

Unlike ForgeRock’s developer-centric approach, Avatier’s workflow designer enables business analysts and IAM administrators to create sophisticated identity workflows without writing a single line of code. This dramatically reduces implementation time and empowers organizations to adapt their IAM processes without developer dependencies.

1. Container-Based Architecture

Avatier pioneered Identity-as-a-Container (IDaaC) technology, allowing organizations to deploy standardized identity services across hybrid cloud environments while maintaining consistent governance. This containerized approach facilitates rapid deployment while providing the flexibility to adapt to diverse infrastructure requirements.

1. Self-Service Capabilities

Avatier emphasizes self-service capabilities that reduce helpdesk burden while accelerating user productivity. From password management to access requests, these self-service tools can be rapidly deployed to deliver immediate business value.

Real-World Implementation Timeframes

The contrast between ForgeRock and Avatier becomes most apparent when examining real-world implementation timeframes:

Implementation Component	ForgeRock Average	Avatier Average
Initial Deployment	3-4 months	2-4 weeks
User Provisioning	2-3 months	2-3 weeks
Access Governance	2-3 months	2-4 weeks
Single Sign-On	1-2 months	1-2 weeks
Password Management	1-2 months	1 week
Total Implementation	6-12 months	6-12 weeks

A recent case study involving a Fortune 1000 financial services organization revealed that after spending 8 months attempting to implement ForgeRock with limited success, they switched to Avatier and achieved full production deployment in just 10 weeks.

Compliance and Security: No Compromises

Some organizations mistakenly assume that faster implementation means compromised security or compliance capabilities. However, Avatier’s Access Governance solution delivers robust security controls and comprehensive compliance coverage without the extended implementation timelines of ForgeRock.

Avatier’s platform supports:

• NIST 800-53 security controls
• SOX compliance requirements
• HIPAA/HITECH regulations
• FISMA and FedRAMP certification paths
• GDPR and CCPA data protection requirements

This compliance coverage is particularly valuable in regulated industries such as healthcare, financial services, and government sectors, where implementation delays can create regulatory exposure.

Total Cost of Ownership Considerations

When evaluating ForgeRock against Avatier, organizations must consider several TCO factors beyond initial licensing costs:

Implementation Costs

• ForgeRock: Typically requires 2-3 full-time consultants for 6-12 months
• Avatier: Typically requires 1-2 part-time consultants for 2-3 months

Ongoing Maintenance

• ForgeRock: Often requires dedicated developer resources for customization maintenance
• Avatier: Can be maintained by existing IAM administrators through configuration interfaces

Upgrade Cycles

• ForgeRock: Major upgrades typically take 2-3 months with significant testing requirements
• Avatier: Container-based architecture enables upgrades in days rather than months

Staffing Requirements

• ForgeRock: Requires specialized development skills and dedicated IAM resources
• Avatier: Can be operated by general IT staff with basic training

According to Forrester Research, organizations can realize a 35-45% reduction in TCO by selecting IAM solutions with lower implementation complexity and ongoing maintenance requirements.

Why CISOs and IT Leaders Are Switching to Avatier

The growing trend of organizations switching from complex IAM platforms like ForgeRock to more agile solutions like Avatier is driven by several factors:

1. Faster Time-to-Value: Security leaders face increasing pressure to demonstrate ROI on security investments. Avatier’s rapid deployment model delivers measurable security improvements in weeks rather than months.
2. Resource Optimization: IT leaders must balance security needs with limited resources. Avatier’s no-code approach allows organizations to implement robust IAM without diverting developers from other critical initiatives.
3. Risk Reduction: Extended implementation timelines create security gaps. Avatier’s rapid go-live approach closes identity security gaps more quickly, reducing organizational risk.
4. Business Alignment: Modern IAM must adapt to changing business needs. Avatier’s configurable platform allows security teams to quickly respond to organizational changes without extensive redevelopment.
5. Predictable Costs: Budget predictability is increasingly important. Avatier’s standardized implementation approach delivers more predictable costs compared to highly customized solutions.

Making the Transition from ForgeRock to Avatier

For organizations currently struggling with ForgeRock implementations or considering a platform change, Avatier offers several migration paths:

1. Phased Migration: Begin with high-value components like password management or self-service access requests while maintaining existing identity stores.
2. Parallel Implementation: Deploy Avatier alongside existing ForgeRock components, gradually shifting functionality as implementation progresses.
3. Complete Replacement: For organizations early in their ForgeRock implementation, a complete platform switch may provide the most cost-effective long-term solution.

Avatier’s professional services team includes specialists with deep experience in ForgeRock environments, enabling smooth transitions with minimal disruption to existing identity processes.

Conclusion: Balancing Capability and Complexity

The choice between ForgeRock and Avatier ultimately represents a fundamental decision about how organizations approach identity security. While ForgeRock offers extensive customization for organizations with unlimited resources and implementation timelines, Avatier delivers comparable security outcomes with dramatically reduced complexity and faster time-to-value.

Each day spent on complex IAM implementation represents another day of suboptimal identity security. By choosing Avatier’s rapid go-live approach, organizations can significantly accelerate their identity security maturity while avoiding the hidden costs and technical debt associated with more complex alternatives.

For CISOs and IT leaders facing budget constraints, resource limitations, and increasing security pressures, Avatier’s Identity Anywhere platform represents the optimal balance of capability and complexity—delivering enterprise-grade identity security without the implementation burden.

Try Avatier today