August 14, 2025 • Mary Marshall

The Role of Managed Service Providers in Protecting Biometric Data: Beyond Fingerprints

Discover how MSPs secure biometric data with AI identity solutions—outperforming Okta while ensuring compliance and protecting markers.

Leveraging Blockchain for Secure Data Tamper Detection on Mainframes

Biometric authentication has moved from science fiction to everyday reality. From fingerprint scans unlocking smartphones to facial recognition granting access to secure facilities, biometrics represent both unprecedented convenience and serious privacy concerns. As organizations increasingly collect and store sensitive biometric identifiers, Managed Service Providers (MSPs) play a critical role in safeguarding this uniquely personal data.

The Biometric Revolution: Opportunity and Risk

Biometric data—including fingerprints, facial geometry, voice patterns, and even behavioral biometrics like keystroke dynamics—offers unprecedented authentication accuracy. Unlike passwords that can be forgotten or stolen, your biometric markers are uniquely yours and always with you.

The market reflects this advantage—biometric system adoption is accelerating rapidly, with the global biometric system market projected to reach $82.9 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 19.3%. This growth is driven by increased security concerns, regulatory compliance requirements, and consumer acceptance of biometric authentication methods.

However, this revolution brings significant risks. According to research from Microsoft’s security team, over 78% of organizations using biometric authentication lack proper security protocols for storing and managing this sensitive data. Unlike a credit card or password, biometric identifiers cannot be changed if compromised—you can’t get a new fingerprint or iris pattern.

Why Biometric Data Protection Demands Specialized Expertise

Biometric data presents unique challenges that many organizations are ill-equipped to handle:

  1. Permanence: Unlike passwords or tokens, biometric markers cannot be changed if compromised
  2. Privacy implications: Biometric data is inherently personal and subject to strict regulations
  3. Complex security requirements: Storing and processing biometric data requires specialized encryption and security protocols
  4. Cross-border compliance challenges: Different jurisdictions have varying rules regarding biometric data

According to a recent survey by Ping Identity, 92% of IT security professionals acknowledge that biometric data demands higher protection standards than other authentication methods, yet only 36% report having specialized security measures in place.

The MSP Advantage in Biometric Security Management

Managed Service Providers offer critical advantages in protecting biometric data through specialized identity management services that support the entire biometric lifecycle:

1. Specialized Compliance Expertise

MSPs maintain up-to-date knowledge of complex regulatory frameworks governing biometric data protection, including:

  • GDPR: Classifies biometric data as “special category data” requiring explicit consent and enhanced protection
  • BIPA: Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act sets strict requirements for consent, disclosure, and secure storage
  • CCPA/CPRA: California’s regulations require specific disclosures and protections for biometric information
  • Industry-specific regulations: HIPAA for healthcare, FERPA for education, and PCI DSS for payment processing

For sectors like education, FERPA-compliant identity management solutions provide the specialized protection needed for student biometric data. Similarly, healthcare organizations require HIPAA-compliant identity management to protect patient biometric identifiers.

2. Advanced Security Infrastructure

MSPs deploy comprehensive security measures specifically designed for biometric data protection:

  • Encryption at rest and in transit: Using strong encryption algorithms specifically suitable for biometric template protection
  • Secure template storage: Ensuring biometric templates are stored in a non-reversible format
  • Tokenization: Converting biometric data into tokens that can be revoked if compromised
  • Secure matching algorithms: Employing algorithms that compare templates without exposing raw biometric data

3. Zero-Trust Architecture Implementation

Modern MSPs implement zero-trust security frameworks essential for biometric data protection:

  • Continuous authentication: Beyond one-time verification, monitoring ongoing user behavior patterns
  • Least privilege access: Restricting access to biometric data only to essential personnel and systems
  • Micro-segmentation: Isolating biometric databases from other systems to contain potential breaches
  • Multi-factor authentication: Requiring additional verification beyond biometrics for sensitive operations

4. AI-Driven Threat Detection and Response

Artificial intelligence has transformed how MSPs protect biometric data:

  • Anomaly detection: AI systems identify unusual access patterns or processing of biometric data
  • Behavioral biometrics: Advanced systems analyze patterns in how users interact with systems as an additional security layer
  • Automated incident response: Immediate containment actions when potential breaches are detected
  • Continuous learning: Security systems that evolve based on emerging threat patterns

According to SailPoint’s 2023 Identity Security Report, organizations leveraging AI-driven identity management solutions experience 72% fewer identity-related security incidents compared to those using legacy systems.

Key Challenges in Biometric Data Protection for MSPs

Despite their advantages, MSPs face significant challenges in biometric data protection:

1. Template Security vs. Accuracy Tradeoffs

The fundamental challenge in biometric security is balancing template protection with matching accuracy. More secure templates (with less original data) can reduce matching accuracy, while more detailed templates improve accuracy but increase security risks.

MSPs must navigate this balance by implementing:

  • Cancelable biometrics: Systems that distort biometric data in a repeatable way that can be “canceled” if compromised
  • Homomorphic encryption: Allowing matching operations on encrypted templates without decryption
  • Multi-biometric systems: Combining multiple biometric factors to maintain accuracy while reducing the detail needed in any single template

2. Cross-Border Data Transfer Complexities

MSPs often support global organizations, requiring navigation of complex international data transfer regulations:

  • Data localization requirements: Some jurisdictions require biometric data to remain within national borders
  • Varying consent standards: Different regions have different requirements for obtaining valid consent
  • International transfer mechanisms: Implementing appropriate safeguards for cross-border transfers

3. Evolving Presentation Attack Detection

As biometric systems become more widespread, so do sophisticated presentation attacks (spoofing):

  • Liveness detection: Implementing technologies that verify a biometric is being presented by a live person
  • Anti-spoofing measures: Detecting fake fingerprints, photos, voice recordings, or deepfakes
  • Continuous security updates: Staying ahead of increasingly sophisticated spoofing technologies

Best Practices for MSPs Managing Biometric Identity Systems

Organizations leveraging MSPs for biometric data protection should ensure their providers implement these essential practices:

1. Implement Comprehensive Access Governance

Effective governance of who can access biometric data and under what conditions is critical:

  • Strict role-based access control: Only authorized personnel should access biometric databases
  • Privileged access management: Special controls for administrative access to biometric systems
  • Access certification campaigns: Regular reviews of who has access to biometric data
  • Detailed audit trails: Maintaining comprehensive logs of all biometric data access

2. Deploy Secure Biometric Template Storage

The storage of biometric templates requires specialized security measures:

  • Template transformation: Converting raw biometric data into non-reversible templates
  • Distributed storage: Splitting biometric templates across multiple secure locations
  • Secure elements: Using hardware security modules or trusted execution environments
  • Regular security assessments: Conducting specialized penetration testing of biometric storage systems

3. Establish Strong Data Lifecycle Management

MSPs should implement comprehensive lifecycle management for biometric data:

  • Clear collection policies: Establishing transparent processes for obtaining and documenting consent
  • Minimization practices: Collecting only necessary biometric data
  • Retention limits: Establishing and enforcing policies for how long biometric data is kept
  • Secure deletion procedures: Ensuring complete destruction of biometric data when no longer needed

4. Develop Specialized Incident Response Plans

Standard breach response procedures are insufficient for biometric data breaches:

  • Biometric-specific playbooks: Developing response plans specifically for biometric data compromise
  • Specialized forensic capabilities: Having expertise to investigate biometric system breaches
  • Template revocation procedures: Processes to invalidate compromised biometric templates
  • Transparent notification processes: Clear procedures for informing affected individuals about biometric data breaches

The Future of Biometric Data Protection for MSPs

Looking ahead, several trends will shape how MSPs protect biometric data:

1. Decentralized Biometric Identity

Moving away from centralized biometric databases toward user-controlled identity:

  • Self-sovereign identity: Allowing individuals to control their own biometric data
  • Blockchain-based verification: Using distributed ledger technology for secure biometric verification without centralized storage
  • Edge processing: Performing biometric matching on user devices rather than in central systems

2. Privacy-Enhancing Technologies

Advancing technologies that protect privacy while enabling authentication:

  • Biometric encryption: Systems that generate cryptographic keys from biometric data without storing templates
  • Zero-knowledge proofs: Allowing verification without revealing actual biometric data
  • Synthetic biometric identifiers: Creating non-sensitive identifiers derived from but not replicating actual biometric data

3. Multimodal Biometric Fusion

Combining multiple biometrics for enhanced security and accuracy:

  • Complementary biometrics: Using combinations like face+voice or fingerprint+iris
  • Continuous multimodal authentication: Ongoing verification using multiple biometric factors
  • Risk-adaptive authentication: Adjusting biometric requirements based on context and risk level

Conclusion: The MSP Imperative in Biometric Security

As biometric data becomes increasingly central to identity verification and access control, organizations face unprecedented security and compliance challenges. MSPs with specialized identity management expertise offer the technical capabilities, compliance knowledge, and security infrastructure necessary to protect this sensitive data.

By implementing comprehensive biometric security frameworks, from secure template storage to privacy-enhancing technologies, MSPs enable organizations to leverage the convenience and security of biometrics while minimizing privacy and compliance risks.

For organizations using or considering biometric systems, partnering with an MSP that offers specialized identity management solutions is no longer optional—it’s imperative for responsible data stewardship in an increasingly biometric world.

The future of secure identity management lies in balancing the remarkable convenience of biometric authentication with rigorous protection of this most personal data. With the right MSP partnership, organizations can confidently navigate this complex landscape, protecting both their systems and the biometric privacy of their users.

Mary Marshall